Board decisions

What the Board granted and denied for hearing loss

By Hector K, Air Force veteranUpdated September 2026 from 1,479,738 Board decisions

In the Board decisions we have indexed since 2019, veterans raised 59,991 issues about hearing loss. Of the ones it decided, the Board granted 32 percent. It sent 39 percent of all these issues back for more work.

Every decision counted here is an appeal. The regional office decided the claim first, the veteran disagreed, and the Board is the next step after that. These are not the odds on a first claim.

Since 2019

9,489granted
20,546denied
23,268sent back
32 percentgranted, of the ones decided

2,814 were reopened for a fresh look, which is not a grant and is not counted as one. 3,527 were dismissed or withdrawn. 347 ended some other way, or we could not read the outcome.

Across every year we have indexed, that is 201,674 issues across 175,245 decisions, 27 percent granted of the ones decided, and 37 percent sent back for more work.

What a remand is

A remand is not a yes or a no. The Board sends the claim back to the regional office for more work, such as a new exam or a record that was not in the file. The claim is decided again later, and that later decision is a separate document.

What showed up in the decisions

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Share of issues whose written decision mentions each item, by outcome, across every year we have indexed
What the decision mentionsGranted29,532 issuesDenied78,166 issues
A medical opinion, or the words nexus or at least as likely as not, anywhere in the decision83 percent68 percent
The words lay statement, buddy statement, or lay evidence60 percent58 percent
The veteran or a witness testified at a hearing47 percent34 percent
The decision calls an exam or medical opinion inadequate9 percent7 percent

These are mentions in the written decision, not reasons for the outcome. A denied issue can mention a doctor's opinion just as a granted one does. Whether the opinion was for or against the claim, and the reasons it gave, are not something these counts can see. Each item is counted for the whole decision, so it may concern another issue decided in the same document.

Claimed together

A pair gets its own page once it appears at least 100 times and the Board decided at least 20 of them. Pairs below that are in the data but have no page.

Claimed as secondary to hearing loss

Hearing loss claimed as secondary to something else

Five recent decisions about hearing loss

What this means for you

For the rating, the hearing test is what counts. The VA rates hearing loss from one kind of test. It measures the softest tones you can hear at several pitches, and how many spoken words you get right. The rating comes off a table from those two results. A test from a private clinic counts toward the rating when a state-licensed audiologist ran both parts, the word test was the Maryland CNC list, and you were tested without hearing aids. Ask the clinic for those three things before you rely on it. Other tests can still show that you have hearing loss, and when it began.

For service connection, the link is the case. The Board looks for noise in service and an opinion on how the loss got from there to now. Your job, your unit, and your duty station tell the noise story. Ask for copies of your entry and separation hearing tests, so a doctor can compare the two.

Normal hearing at separation is not the end. Hearing loss can show up years later, and the rules allow service connection for a condition diagnosed after discharge when the evidence ties it to service. Ask the examiner to explain why the years in between do or do not fit. An opinion that gives reasons is what the claim rests on.

Hearing loss and tinnitus are separate issues, even when they are claimed together. A decision on one does not decide the other.

Keep reading

Start my Claim Map

Free to use. The written playbook is $49.99 once, when it ships.

An issue is counted in a family by its diagnostic code or by the words in the issue. One issue can be counted in more than one family. Percent granted is of the ones the Board decided, so remands and dismissals are left out. The example decisions are recent ones we could link whose issue names this condition, chosen so that both outcomes are shown when we have them. Reopened claims and effective-date disputes are left out. Past decisions do not predict yours. Each page states the decisions from 2019 on, and says so, unless the Board decided too few of them since 2019 to give a percentage worth reading. Where that happens the page counts every year instead and tells you it has. This page is education, not legal advice. Rules quoted are from 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4, as published on the government's eCFR website. Board decisions are public records, linked at their source.