Board decisions
Sleep apnea secondary to COPD
In the Board decisions we have indexed since 2019, sleep apnea appeared as secondary to COPD in 99 issues. The Board granted 17, denied 19, and sent 61 back for more work. Of the ones it decided, it granted 47 percent.
Every decision counted here is an appeal. The regional office decided the claim first, the veteran disagreed, and the Board is the next step after that. These are not the odds on a first claim.
Since 2019
1 were reopened for a fresh look, which is not a grant and is not counted as one. 1 were dismissed or withdrawn.
Across every year we have indexed, that is 188 issues, 39 percent granted of the ones decided, and 65 percent sent back for more work.
What a secondary claim needs
In a secondary claim, the Board reads for three things. A diagnosis of the second condition. A first condition that is already service connected. And a medical opinion that says the first condition led to the second, or made it worse, and explains why. The rule itself is shorter than that. Here is the part that matters.
… disability which is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury shall be service connected.
38 CFR 3.310(a), from the middle of its first sentence
Proximately due to means the first condition led to the second. The other route is aggravation, where the first condition made the second worse. The rule for that route is in the next paragraph of the same section, and it says increase in severity.
Any increase in severity of a nonservice-connected disease or injury that is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury, and not due to the natural progress of the nonservice-connected disease, will be service connected.
38 CFR 3.310(b), first sentence
That paragraph goes on to say the VA will not concede aggravation without a baseline. A baseline is medical evidence of how bad the second condition was before the first one started making it worse, or the earliest record after that and before the evidence of how bad it is now. If you claim aggravation, find the earliest record you have of the second condition, from either window. Without a baseline from one of them, the VA will not concede aggravation. The other route, that the first condition led to the second, does not need a baseline.
A remand is not a yes or a no. The Board sends the claim back to the regional office for more work, such as a new exam or a record that was not in the file. The claim is decided again later, and that later decision is a separate document.
Recent decisions on these claims
- August 4, 2025Granted
Entitlement to service connection for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), secondary to service-connected asthma and bronchitis, on a causation basis
Read the decision at VA.gov - July 29, 2025Denied
Entitlement to service connection for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), to include as secondary to COPD and service-connected disabilities, including obesity as an intermediate step
Read the decision at VA.gov - March 20, 2025Granted
Entitlement to service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, as secondary to service-connected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with lung cancer and chronic hypoxic respiratory failure
Read the decision at VA.gov - January 22, 2025Denied
Entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea (OSA), to include as secondary to toxic exposure and/or service-connected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Read the decision at VA.gov - January 2, 2025Granted
Entitlement to service connection for obstructive sleep apnea ("OSA"), secondary to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ("COPD")
Read the decision at VA.gov
Keep reading
COPD and bronchitis
The first condition. Since 2019: 9,263 issues, 31 percent granted of the ones decided
Sleep apnea
The second condition. Since 2019: 34,160 issues, 50 percent granted of the ones decided
Heart disease secondary to COPD
Since 2019: 37 issues paired, 46 percent granted of the ones decided
Free to use. The written playbook is $49.99 once, when it ships.
We count an issue in a pair when its text says one condition is secondary to the other and we can place both in a condition family. Percent granted is of the ones the Board decided, so remands and dismissals are left out. Past decisions do not predict yours. Each page states the decisions from 2019 on, and says so, unless the Board decided too few of them since 2019 to give a percentage worth reading. Where that happens the page counts every year instead and tells you it has. This page is education, not legal advice. Rules quoted are from 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4, as published on the government's eCFR website. Board decisions are public records, linked at their source.