Board decisions
Radiculopathy or neuropathy secondary to lower back conditions
In the Board decisions we have indexed since 2019, radiculopathy or neuropathy appeared as secondary to lower back conditions in 2,599 issues. The Board granted 670, denied 451, and sent 1,379 back for more work. Of the ones it decided, it granted 60 percent.
Every decision counted here is an appeal. The regional office decided the claim first, the veteran disagreed, and the Board is the next step after that. These are not the odds on a first claim.
Since 2019
23 were reopened for a fresh look, which is not a grant and is not counted as one. 67 were dismissed or withdrawn. 9 ended some other way, or we could not read the outcome.
Across every year we have indexed, that is 5,097 issues, 51 percent granted of the ones decided, and 54 percent sent back for more work.
What a doctor would have to find
A claim here needs a doctor to find that the back condition led to or worsened the second condition. It is not a finding of ours. The counts above show how the Board answered, one claim at a time. Whether it is true in your case is a question for your doctor.
What a secondary claim needs
In a secondary claim, the Board reads for three things. A diagnosis of the second condition. A first condition that is already service connected. And a medical opinion that says the first condition led to the second, or made it worse, and explains why. The rule itself is shorter than that. Here is the part that matters.
… disability which is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury shall be service connected.
38 CFR 3.310(a), from the middle of its first sentence
Proximately due to means the first condition led to the second. The other route is aggravation, where the first condition made the second worse. The rule for that route is in the next paragraph of the same section, and it says increase in severity.
Any increase in severity of a nonservice-connected disease or injury that is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury, and not due to the natural progress of the nonservice-connected disease, will be service connected.
38 CFR 3.310(b), first sentence
That paragraph goes on to say the VA will not concede aggravation without a baseline. A baseline is medical evidence of how bad the second condition was before the first one started making it worse, or the earliest record after that and before the evidence of how bad it is now. If you claim aggravation, find the earliest record you have of the second condition, from either window. Without a baseline from one of them, the VA will not concede aggravation. The other route, that the first condition led to the second, does not need a baseline.
A remand is not a yes or a no. The Board sends the claim back to the regional office for more work, such as a new exam or a record that was not in the file. The claim is decided again later, and that later decision is a separate document.
Recent decisions on these claims
A past Board decision binds only the case it decided, and the Board decides each case on its own facts. Another veteran's decision is not evidence about your condition. Read these to see what evidence the Board weighed, so you know what to gather for your own claim.
- June 30, 2026Denied
Service connection for left leg neuropathy/pain, to include as secondary to the claimed lumbosacral strain and DDD with foraminal stenosis
Read the decision at VA.gov - June 24, 2026Granted
Entitlement to service connection for right lower extremity radiculopathy as secondary to a lumbar spine disorder
Read the decision at VA.gov - April 17, 2026Denied
Service connection for sciatic nerve condition as secondary to a lumbar spine condition
Read the decision at VA.gov - March 17, 2026Granted
Entitlement to service connection for left-sided sciatic radiculopathy secondary to a low back disability
Read the decision at VA.gov - March 11, 2026Granted
The claim of entitlement to service connection for bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy condition, as secondary to a service-connected low back disability
Read the decision at VA.gov
The Radiculopathy and Sciatica Pack
Everything the Board has decided about radiculopathy, sciatica, and neuropathy, in one file. How the VA rates it, what gets claimed with it and how often each one was granted, and the decisions to read yourself. No account and nothing to fill in.
See what is in it Go to cart ()
$15, one time. Add as many conditions as you need and pay once.
First time here?
This site is one veteran's method for a VA disability claim, built on the Board's own decisions. Everything under Decisions is free and there is nothing to sign up for. One page per condition and one per pairing, each built from what the Board granted, denied and sent back, with the decisions themselves linked at their source.
Keep reading
Lower back
The first condition. Since 2019: 105,835 issues, 38 percent granted of the ones decided
Radiculopathy, sciatica, and neuropathy
The second condition. Since 2019: 88,255 issues, 41 percent granted of the ones decided
Lower back conditions secondary to radiculopathy or neuropathy
The other way round. Since 2019: 45 issues paired
Knee conditions secondary to lower back conditions
Since 2019: 1,086 issues paired, 27 percent granted of the ones decided
Hip conditions secondary to lower back conditions
Since 2019: 1,099 issues paired, 30 percent granted of the ones decided
Neck conditions secondary to lower back conditions
Since 2019: 787 issues paired, 23 percent granted of the ones decided
Depression or anxiety secondary to lower back conditions
Since 2019: 511 issues paired, 70 percent granted of the ones decided
Foot conditions secondary to lower back conditions
Since 2019: 452 issues paired, 33 percent granted of the ones decided
Sources
- The rule that Board decisions are not precedent, 38 CFR 20.1303.
We count an issue in a pair when its text says one condition is secondary to the other and we can place both in a condition family. Percent granted is of the ones the Board decided, so remands and dismissals are left out. Past decisions do not predict yours. Each page states the decisions from 2019 on, and says so, unless the Board decided too few of them since 2019 to give a percentage worth reading. Where that happens the page counts every year instead and tells you it has. This page is education, not legal advice. Rules quoted are from 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4, as published on the government's eCFR website. Board decisions are public records, linked at their source.