Board decisions

What the Board granted and denied for radiculopathy, sciatica, and neuropathy

By Hector K, Air Force veteranUpdated September 2026 from 1,479,738 Board decisions

In the Board decisions we have indexed since 2019, veterans raised 83,835 issues about radiculopathy, sciatica, and neuropathy. Of the ones it decided, the Board granted 42 percent. It sent 43 percent of all these issues back for more work.

Every decision counted here is an appeal. The regional office decided the claim first, the veteran disagreed, and the Board is the next step after that. These are not the odds on a first claim.

Since 2019

17,345granted
24,397denied
35,826sent back
42 percentgranted, of the ones decided

1,182 were reopened for a fresh look, which is not a grant and is not counted as one. 4,641 were dismissed or withdrawn. 444 ended some other way, or we could not read the outcome.

Across every year we have indexed, that is 164,615 issues across 85,923 decisions, 39 percent granted of the ones decided, and 43 percent sent back for more work.

What a remand is

A remand is not a yes or a no. The Board sends the claim back to the regional office for more work, such as a new exam or a record that was not in the file. The claim is decided again later, and that later decision is a separate document.

What showed up in the decisions

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Share of issues whose written decision mentions each item, by outcome, across every year we have indexed
What the decision mentionsGranted31,614 issuesDenied50,277 issues
A medical opinion, or the words nexus or at least as likely as not, anywhere in the decision63 percent66 percent
The words lay statement, buddy statement, or lay evidence52 percent58 percent
A hearing was held (the veteran or a witness testified)44 percent36 percent
The decision calls an exam or medical opinion inadequate10 percent7 percent

These are mentions in the written decision, not reasons for the outcome. A denied issue can mention a doctor's opinion just as a granted one does. Whether the opinion was for or against the claim, and the reasons it gave, are not something these counts can see. Each item is counted for the whole decision, so it may concern another issue decided in the same document.

Claimed together

A pair gets its own page once it appears at least 100 times and the Board decided at least 20 of them. Pairs below that are in the data but have no page.

Claimed as secondary to radiculopathy, sciatica, and neuropathy

Radiculopathy, sciatica, and neuropathy claimed as secondary to something else

Recent decisions about radiculopathy, sciatica, and neuropathy

What this means for you

The schedule rates nerve damage by which nerve is affected and by the degree of paralysis, from mild through moderate and severe to complete. Whether the loss is sensory only, or includes weakness or muscle wasting, is what moves the rating.

For a first claim, the link is the case. Nerve pain in the legs or arms is claimed most as secondary to a spine condition, and that claim needs a doctor to say the spine condition led to the nerve damage and to explain why. Diabetes is another first condition named in those decisions.

For a higher rating, bring the exam findings for each nerve: sensation, strength, reflexes, and any wasting. The spine rules say to rate nerve problems separately from the spine rating, so ask that each nerve be examined and named.

Keep reading

Start my Claim Map

Free to use. The written playbook is $49.99 once, when it ships.

An issue is counted in a family by its diagnostic code or by the words in the issue. One issue can be counted in more than one family. Percent granted is of the ones the Board decided, so remands and dismissals are left out. The example decisions are recent ones we could link whose issue names this condition, chosen so that both outcomes are shown when we have them. Reopened claims and effective-date disputes are left out. Past decisions do not predict yours. Each page states the decisions from 2019 on, and says so, unless the Board decided too few of them since 2019 to give a percentage worth reading. Where that happens the page counts every year instead and tells you it has. This page is education, not legal advice. Rules quoted are from 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4, as published on the government's eCFR website. Board decisions are public records, linked at their source.